DB Adds OEM Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep Factory Navigation Radios to Product Offerings

DB Auto Radio announced today that they are adding factory navigation radio offerings for Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles for the 2012 and 2013 model years.

The OEM style radios include many features including;

High resolution 6.5″ touch screen
AM-FM Radio
CD/DVD Player
Audio Input Jack
Internal Hard Drive
USB Port

These radio work seamlessly with factory systems including; Bluetooth, Uconnect Voice Command, Handsfree Calling, On-Star and Sirius XM

The radio is available for these vehicles.

Chrysler

200
300
Town and Country

Dodge

Avenger
Caliber
Challenger
Charger
Grand Caravan
Durango
Journey
Ram

Jeep

Compass
Grand Cherokee
Liberty
Patriot
Wrangler

Since 1981 DB Auto has provided its automobile dealer customers with customized vehicle packages and OEM and aftermarket accessory solutions.

For more information about this vehicle or others please call 800-323-4813, email at info@ats4solutions.com or visit us at dbautoradio.com

20121004-144523.jpg

Posted in Automotive Electronics, Navigation | Tagged | Leave a comment

DB Completes 2012 SLP Supercharged Corvette ZL-610 for Local Chevrolet Dealer

D and B Automotive announced today that they have completed another SLP Supercharged Corvette for a Chicagoland Chevrolet dealer customer.

The vehicle build included a SLP TVS High-Output Supercharger Assembly in flat black, PowerPac 1.85 High Ratio Rocker Arm and Spring Package Super PowerFlo Exhaust and a SLP RTM Hood with Clear Window and Grilles.

Since 1981 DB Auto has provided its automobile dealer customers with customized vehicle packages and OEM and aftermarket accessory solutions.

For more information about this vehicle or others please call 800-323-4813, email at info@ats4solutions.com or visit us at dbautoradio.com

20120921-133522.jpg

Posted in High Performance | Leave a comment

Let the pickup wars begin

Mike Colias
Automotive News — September 17, 2012 – 12:01 am E

DETROIT — General Motors has been cranking out pickups to stockpile them ahead of factory downtime this summer and fall, as it retools for the next-generation trucks due out by summer.

Now it’s crunch time. The company wants to whittle its four-month supply to less than three months by year end. The plan: GM is extending its semiannual truck month promotion, traditionally run in October, over two months and is throwing in big cash for both dealers and buyers.

But GM faces tough competition from rivals Ford, Ram and Toyota, which are clearing out their own 2012 pickups and aren’t in any mood to cede market share.

GM kicked off the promotion right after Labor Day and plans to run it through October. Dealers are trumpeting as much as $3,500 in customer cash — $4,500 for buyers who are trading in vehicles — on most 2012 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra models. And GM is dangling as much as $1,500 per pickup to dealers who can blow past their sales target for both 2012 and 2013 pickups under a GM stair-step program.

The sales push is one step in a complex marketing maneuver. GM’s next-generation pickups, on an all-new platform, are slated for release by late spring as 2014s.

GM had to overbuild its inventory of both 2012 and 2013 models ahead of lost production time at three truck plants — in Flint, Mich.; Fort Wayne, Ind.; and Silao, Mexico. The retooling work has been done intermittently since early this year. Several more down weeks are scheduled for this fall. That left GM with a 122-day supply of Silverados and a 131-day supply of Sierras, or a combined 243,400 units, on Sept. 1. In September 2011, that number was 203,900.

Now it’s trying to chew through the excess.

“They’ve pulled forward truck month, so we get both September and October, and they’re putting a lot of cash on the hoods,” says Chris Haydocy, a Buick-GMC dealer in Columbus, Ohio, whose usual 90-day Sierra supply has crept over 100. “With a little participation from the client, I think we’ll be fine.”

Meanwhile, Ford Motor Co. is hitting the market with its annual F-series promotion in September and October. Chrysler Group is putting cash on the hood of the 2012 Ram ahead of next month’s arrival of the re-engineered 2013 Ram, and Toyota has comparable deals on the Tundra, last redesigned in early 2007.

GM’s rivals are well aware of GM’s lofty pickup inventory. And the threat of their counterattack has added urgency to GM’s sell-down.

“When I heard that Ford had announced their truck month [in September], I definitely felt it was the right thing to have also had [the same timing] in our plan,” says Alan Batey. The no-nonsense Brit and former Chevy sales boss made the call to start the sale in September in his current role as GM’s U.S. vice president of sales and service.

Cash on the hood
Ford is offering customers between $1,500 and $3,000 on the 2012 F-series pickup, depending on engine and trim level, according to AIS Rebates, an Ann Arbor, Mich., company that tracks industry incentives. Chrysler is offering up to $3,500 cash on many 2012 Rams. Through Oct. 1, Toyota is offering up to $3,500 cash back on certain 2012 Tundras.

GM has said it expects its pickup inventory to fall to 80 to 85 days by year end. The company expects pickup sales to get the usual seasonal lift through the fall, aided further by promising economic signs, particularly in the critical housing sector. Lost production time will whittle stocks further.

But GM is handicapped by having the oldest full-sized pickup on the market, introduced in late 2006, which could force it to dig deeper on incentives than its rivals.

“If you’re undecided in the truck market, the Silverado has a disadvantage because it’s gotten a bit stale,” says TrueCar.com analyst Jesse Toprak. “That means the only way to convince people is to sell the deal.”

Still, GM’s customer cash is not outsized compared with past promotions. Last September and October, GM’s consumer incentives were higher for its outgoing pickup models than they are now, AIS Rebates data show.

A GM retail planning calendar recently sent to dealers shows its truck month running through October, but Batey says it’s too early to say whether GM will run the promotion for a second month.

“It’s always competitive in trucks,” Batey says. “Truck months are something the public understands and they expect to see, so I think it will be competitive.”

Dealers’ dilemma
For months, Chevy and GMC dealers have been strategizing as GM pumps the pickups into the system. Some ordered a larger number of trucks than usual, worried that they would run thin when production was crimped from the plant downtime, which began early this year but kicked in especially this summer and fall.

Others ordered more cautiously, worried that they would have to pay extra floorplan interest on a glut now — and that they could be stuck with leftovers when the redesigned trucks arrive.

A Chevy dealer in a Western mountain state says he lost a gamble this spring and summer when he loaded up on trucks that now are piling up on his lots. He welcomes the extended promotional period to help move the excess.

On the other hand, Lynn Thompson, a Springfield, Mo., Buick-GMC dealer, says he was “a little worried” about his 2012 Sierra stocks but says sales improved enough in August to quell his concerns.

Thompson also believes he can hit the objective GM set for his Sierra sales under the dealer incentive that runs from Aug. 28 through Oct. 1.

Dealers who surpass their factory-set baseline target by up to 10 percent earn $100 per truck on a portion of those sales. Dealers who beat their sales targets by 10 to 20 percent get $750 per truck on a portion of the sales. Those who sell 20 to 50 percent more than their target get $1,500 on about half of their total pickup sales.

Thompson said his bogey is “very fair” compared with past target programs.

“We still have to get on our horse and ride,” he says. “But I think we can get there.”

You can reach Mike Colias at mcolias@crain.com.

Per Auto News on January 16, 2012 there were 69 days of supply of the Silverado. That is just over 2 months supply and pretty much optimum for trucks.

GM did not start pumping up full size truck production until later in 2012 to prepare for the coming changeover shut downs.
Report Abuse

Posted in Auto Sales Trends, Automotive Production | Tagged | Leave a comment

GMC Sierra SLP Supercharged Edition Visiting Chicagoland Dealerships

September 13, 2012

DB Automotive is proud to announce the arrival of the GMC Sierra SLP Supercharged Sport Edition Truck.

DB sales representatives will be out visiting local Chicagoland GMC Dealers over the next 2 weeks to allow dealer personnel to see and drive the vehicle. Please let us know if you would like to schedule a particular day and time that would work best for your sales team. This package is available only through new car GMC Dealerships.

Please email us at info@ats4solutions.com or visit our website at http://www.dbautoradio.com

Posted in High Performance, Vehicle Packages | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Pink Camaro SS to Pace NASCAR Race, Raise Money for American Cancer Society

August 31, 2012

Car and Driver

We’re bigger fans of safety cars than we are of pace cars. And we’re pretty confident in our opinion when you compare BMW’s M6 MotoGP safety car or Mercedes’ C63 AMG Coupe Black Series DTM safety car with the likes of, well, this. But despite our biases, we can get on board with the pink Chevy Camaro SS that’s set to pace the AdvoCare 500 NASCAR Sprint Cup race from Atlanta.

GM says that for every caution lap the Camaro paces, it will donate $200 to the American Cancer society. It did the same thing at Atlanta’s fall race last year, too, raising $12,800. For once, we’re in favor of NASCAR’s liberal use of the yellow flag.

Posted in Vehicle Packages | Tagged | Leave a comment

Is This the End of Is This the End of Cars as We Know It?

By Rick Aristotle
Motley Fool

August 21, 2012

Premium Rush opens soon at a multiplex near you.

The action thriller — with its “Ride Like Hell” tag line — follows a bike messenger around Manhattan being pursued by seedy types.

A bike messenger? Really?

We haven’t entirely lost our appetite for cars. The Fast and the Furious 6 is still slated to hit theaters next year. However, younger viewers seem to be less interested in fancy rides these days — and it’s not just a timely cinematic debut that’s nudging me to that conclusion.

A Bloomberg article earlier this month had plenty of tantalizing data points.

According to R.L. Polk & Co., just 11% of this country’s auto sales in April were to buyers between the ages of 18 and 34. Six years ago that group made up 17% of the industry’s sales.

The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute concludes that just 81% of 20-to-24-year-olds had driver’s licenses in 2010, down from 92% in 1983.

Deloitte studied U.S. consumers born from 1981 to 2001 to find that smartphones are more desirable than cars.

That last point is important. The unsure economy isn’t helping, but cash-strapped Millennials are prioritizing their expenditures and costly wireless data plans are winning out over car loan payments and auto insurance.

This is unwelcome news for automakers, and it could even potentially be a sticking point for Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI ) . Analysts see Ford (NYSE: F ) and General Motors (NYSE: GM ) posting declining profitability on flat sales growth this year. Satellite radio is holding up considerably better, as Sirius XM has been tacking on net new subscribers for a dozen consecutive quarters.

Harley-Davidson (NYSE: HOG ), on the other hand, is expected to post improving profitability on a 6% uptick in sales this year.

However, the smarter trend would be to bank on the country’s youth flocking to metropolitan cities with improving mass transit systems to get around. Car-sharing services will also continue to benefit.

Despite its stock taking a beating since going public last year, Zipcar (Nasdaq: ZIP ) continues to grow. Membership has climbed 21% over the past year, as thrifty drivers escape the high costs of auto ownership by renting vehicles — with gas and insurance included — by the hour.

This could all be an economic hiccup. It’s the country’s youth that’s saddled with steep student loans and fighting to land low-paying jobs. How can they be expected to get around in even secondhand rides? When prosperity returns, maybe they’ll stop cheering on bike messengers and swearing off gas guzzlers.

However, for now this has all the makings of a legitimate shift in consumer value perceptions and the prioritization of gadgets over cars as icons of freedom.

Posted in Auto Sales Trends | Tagged | Leave a comment

Apple SVP Confirms Steve Jobs’ iCar Dream

Austin Carr | August 3, 2012

Thanks to Apple’s court battle with Samsung over patent issues, loads of interesting details are pouring out about the famously secretive company. Today, Apple’s SVP of marketing Phil Schiller took the stand and revealed another fascinating detail: Before Apple made the iPhone, the company was considering making a car and other “crazy stuff,” Schiller said, according to the New York Times’ Nick Bilton, who is reporting at the courthouse.

The revelation not only confirms our earlier report that Steve Jobs was interested creating an iCar but implies it was more than a pipe dream–the company was actually seriously considering the product, it seems. At Fast Company’s recent Innovation Uncensored conference, J. Crew CEO and Apple board member Mickey Drexler first hinted that Cupertino might be interested in becoming more like Detroit. “Look at the car industry; it’s a tragedy in America. Who is designing the cars?” Drexler said. “Steve’s dream before he died was to design an iCar.”

“And,” Drexler added with a smirk, “it would’ve been probably 50% of the market. He never did design it.”

Though the iCar never came to market, elements of Apple’s products have made their way into the automobile industry. Siri, the popular iPhone virtual assistant, will soon make her way into cars developed by Mercedes, GM, BMW, and more.

Posted in Automotive Production | Leave a comment

How TrueCar’s Yahoo! deal failed

Jason Stein – Automotive News

In the burgeoning world of automotive lead generators, Scott Painter was going to break out from the pack. The serial entrepreneur placed a huge bet late last year when he agreed to pay $50 million a year to Internet portal Yahoo! for his TrueCar.com to become the exclusive automotive partner of Yahoo! Autos.

The deal was supposed to channel 10 million unique visitors per month to TrueCar.com from the pages of Yahoo! Autos. But that exclusive deal was scrapped last week by both parties, and Yahoo! is opening up to multiple partners.

Since the deal began Jan. 1, TrueCar’s traffic actually plunged as the company ran into trouble with dealer associations and some state regulators and cut its own consumer advertising. Privately, both sides said the arrangement was disappointing.

Now Yahoo! says it is opening Yahoo! Autos to “multiple dealers and third parties,” including a button to TrueCar.

On the surface, TrueCar-Yahoo! is a tale of a bad bet by Painter, an Internet entrepreneur, who aggressively tried to accelerate into auto retailing through a mass-market Internet portal. And Yahoo! is massive. With 167 million unique visitors in May, Yahoo! was No. 2 in U.S. Web traffic behind Google, according to Comscore, which measures Web traffic.

But it’s difficult to disrupt established players in auto marketing and retailing — even though online shopping itself is roiling the business.

TrueCar is among more than 100 online shopping sites that send millions of leads to dealers, who are struggling to sort out hot prospects from casual tire kickers. Internet heavyweight Google has begun dipping its toe in online lead generation.

Dealers and the factories, meanwhile, are beefing up their own Web sites to reduce their reliance on third-party lead generators. Car shoppers swiftly migrated to the Web, but the battle over which kind of Web site is far from over.

Disrupter
TrueCar started as an outside disrupter in auto retailing. The site promised big discounts to shoppers. And to dealers, Painter said pay us only when our lead turns into a sale.

But TrueCar butted heads with various entrenched players.

Painter, 43, armed with outside investors, ramped up TrueCar’s profile late last year by spending millions of dollars a month for national TV spots pitching great deals to consumers on TrueCar.com.

As a result, Web traffic on TrueCar.com — and dealer interest — soared. Painter said he was aiming to sign dealerships with a total of 10,000 franchises.

He gained an even higher profile on Jan. 1, when TrueCar became Yahoo! Autos’ exclusive partner, replacing Cars.com, which had been with Yahoo! for four years. Shoppers who went to Yahoo! Autos were referred only to TrueCar and its participating dealerships. At its peak, TrueCar said it had signed dealerships with 5,500 franchises.

But then the troubles started. Regulators and dealer associations in at least eight states had said TrueCar’s business practices were in possible violation of laws designed to protect consumers and dealers. For instance, the TrueCar site mentioned “invoice pricing,” which many states ban in advertising.

And many dealers were griping that TrueCar’s emphasis on huge discounts was driving down transaction prices.

The bad press and the legal problems caused many dealers to drop TrueCar. They typically paid $299 for each lead that turned into a sale.

Traffic plummets
And around Feb. 1, TrueCar stopped its national TV spots. Figures from Compete Inc., which measures Web traffic, show in part the toll taken by the loss of TV advertising and by TrueCar’s troubles with state regulators and dealer associations.

TrueCar’s monthly unique visitors peaked last December at 1.8 million, according to Compete.

But even after the deal with Yahoo! became active, January traffic declined to 1.15 million. Traffic plummeted to about 600,000 in February and 311,000 in May, the most recent month measured by Compete.

Realizing he needed dealers’ support, Painter vowed to rethink TrueCar’s approach. He established a dealer advisory board, hired an executive — Pat Watson, former CEO of the South Carolina Automobile Dealers Association — to work with dealer associations and reworked his Web site to comply with state laws.

TrueCar said the dealer-friendly changes are working. After falling from 5,500 participating franchises early this year to 3,500 at its low, the company has rebuilt the number to 4,300, the company says.

Under the revised Yahoo! deal, TrueCar’s payments will be triggered when TrueCar receives a minimum number of leads and a minimum number of high-quality leads from Yahoo! Autos. TrueCar has a similar arrangement with its other partners, such as USAA.

Google jumps in
Google, by jumping into the lead-generation business last month, underlined the importance of high-quality leads for dealerships.

In a test in San Francisco, Google is using data-mining techniques that purport to identify auto shoppers ready to buy — not tire kickers.

If Google identifies a shopper ready to buy, inventory of participating dealers pops up on the shopper’s Google search pages. Google declined to say whether the test would go national.

Asked about Google’s interest in auto shopping, both Cars.com and Edmunds.com said they concentrate on building a rich site for consumers, with reviews, vehicle specs and other content. That’s the best way to attract and keep shoppers ready to buy, they say.

Brian Pasch, CEO of dealer marketing consultancy PCG Digital Marketing, said Internet-savvy dealers are building the content of their own Web sites to attract shoppers. They are also using paid search to find prospects. That’s when dealers bid, typically on the dominant Google, to own key search words to steer shoppers to them.

Thus dealers are becoming less reliant on third-party leads, and that puts more pressure on lead generators such as TrueCar to deliver high-quality leads.

So TrueCar failed to break out from the pack of Internet lead providers. It’s now trying to rebuild its business as a partner — not a disrupter — of dealers.

Ryan Beene contributed to this report

You can reach Jason Stein at jstein@crain.com.

Posted in Internet MArketing and Sales | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

2013 Cadillac ATS Test Drive

Tony Swan | July 1, 2012

On Sale Date: Fall 2012

Price: $33,900 to $42,090

Competitors: Audi A4, BMW 3 Series, Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Powertrains: (example) 2.5-liter I-4, 202 hp, 191 lb-ft; 2.0-liter I-4 turbo, 272 hp, 260 lb-ft; 3.6-liter V-6, 321 hp, 275 lb-ft; six-speed manual, six-speed automatic, RWD or AWD

EPA Fuel Economy (city/hwy): 19–22/28–32 (est.)

What’s New: The ATS represents another step in Cadillac’s campaign to match the performance and catch up to the sales numbers of the premium German sports sedans, in particular the long dominant BMW 3 Series. It’s a compact sedan—the lightest Caddy in decades—developed on all-new architecture that’s smaller than the midsize CTS. The ATS is basically rear-wheel drive, with the option of sending power to all four wheels. It comes to Cadillac showrooms in mid-August with three engine choices, two transmissions (automatic and manual, both six-speed), and a wide variety of trim and infotainment options. The softened styling is consistent with the design language established by the CTS.

The body shell is a masterpiece of designing for high chassis rigidity and simultaneous weight reduction. Materials include an alchemist’s recipe of high-strength steel, aluminum, and a pinch or two of magnesium, painstakingly whittled and shaved—a gram here, a gram there—to minimize curb weights. Those weights range from just over 3300 pounds to 3629 for all-wheel drive and V-6 power, according to Cadillac. At the same time, the symphony of structural materials, spot welds, rivets, and structural adhesives yields a very stiff body shell, up to 40 percent stiffer than the midsize CTS. Chassis rigidity is the key to all vehicle dynamics, and the ATS delivers.

Tech Tidbit: Infotainment electronics keep getting more sophisticated, more graphically attractive, and more easily accessible. Cadillac CUE (for Cadillac User Experience) is the latest example. It’s capable of pairing data from up to 10 Bluetooth mobile devices, USB plug-ins, SD cards, and MP3 players, with fewer buttons and larger icons.

Driving Character: Cadillac’s ATS strategy was simple: Duplicate BMW 3 Series dynamics, including its eager responses, supple ride, quiet interior, and surgically precise steering. The ATS nails most of that list, particularly because of Cadillac’s auto-damping magnetorheological shocks (better known as Magnetic Ride Control), part of the FE3 suspension. Body motions are well controlled, with limited roll, great balance, right-now transient response, and powerful fade-free braking. The manual transmission (turbo only) amplifies the bond between car and driver. Though there could be improvement on one particular attribute (see Driver’s Grievance), the ATS generally inspires confidence, simultaneously delivering all-day comfort.

Favorite Detail: In a competitive set that prioritizes decisive responses, Cadillac’s FE3 suspension package, with Magnetic Ride Control damping, limited-slip differential, and Brembo brakes, puts the ATS on an equal dynamic footing with its German rivals. This combination, with the 2.0-liter turbo and manual transmission, would not be out of place at track-day events.

Driver’s Grievance: Cadillac’s electric rack-and-pinion power steering varies assist, but tactile information is all but absent. The Tremec six-speed manual gearbox makes the most of the turbo’s torque, but shift engagements could be more positive.

The Bottom Line: The ATS’s engine trio, distinctive styling, and other highlights give it the chops to be the first truly competitive compact luxury sports sedan from the U.S. It also delivers a broad range of trim and feature choices, across a price ladder that climbs from $33,900 to $42,090. Best in class? To be determined. A contender? No question.

Posted in Automotive Production | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lincoln Wants 2015 Mustang Components for RWD Sedan, Could Be a Study In Ford’s Brand Discipline

June 22, 2012 at 11:52am by Dave Mable

With development of the all-new 2015 Mustang well underway, the car’s component set—or more precisely, part of its component set—has activated interest in a rear-wheel-drive platform to underpin a Lincoln sedan.

We’ve learned that Ford is contemplating a new four-door platform using the next Mustang’s MacPherson front and new independent rear suspension (spy photos of the new rear setup here) as its basis, along with some of the pony car’s larger underbody stampings. With the manufacturer time and again stating its commitment to the wayward Lincoln brand, moving forward with rear-drive plans would allow the blue oval to back up its words with something of substance. Indeed, key folks in Lincoln’s planning and design departments are on the prowl for rear-drive products that can go head-to-head with Cadillac and other serious luxury makes. There are three possibilities, as outlined below.

A Series of Vacuums in the Lineup

Compared to key competitors Cadillac and Lexus, the current Lincoln range shows a number of empty spaces. The most obvious missing product is an entry-level luxury performance sedan, a segment contested by Cadillac with the new ATS and by Lexus with the IS. There are those within Ford who believe that the 2013 MKZ with its optional AWD is a player in this segment; these may be the same people who thought the Ford SVT Contour was a BMW 3-series competitor. Make no mistake, while the MKZ is well-positioned enough to go mano a mano with the soft Lexus ES, it lacks the street cred to play in the same sandbox with the 3-series, ATS, Infiniti G, Audi A4, or Mercedes-Benz C-class.

The next void in Lincoln’s offerings isn’t so much a hole as it is a misaligned product: the MKS sedan. Essentially a re-skinned Taurus with a snazzier interior, the MKS has never found footing in a segment populated by harder-running cars such as the Cadillac CTS, BMW 5-series, Lexus GS, Infiniti M, and Mercedes E-class. In 2011, Lincoln sold just 12,217 examples of the MKS. For comparison, Cadillac moved more than 55,000 CTS models during the same period—it was the second-highest seller among its competition. Although station wagons and coupes factor into the CTS totals, it’s nevertheless true that Lincoln sold just 22 percent of what Cadillac did in this profitable segment. While it wouldn’t guarantee success—execution would key that metric—a rear-wheel-drive entry from Lincoln might allow the brand to close the gap. On paper, the current MKS looks to be better positioned to challenge Cadillac’s XTS anyway, and a new RWD mid-sizer would free the MKS up to serve as the cushy techno-cruiser it really wants to be.

2015 Ford Mustang independent rear suspension

The third and most obvious hole in the Lincoln range calls for a brand-defining large car. With only two sedans in Lincoln’s rudderless lineup, a vehicle like this may be even more important for the brand than it is for Cadillac. Unfortunately, this would be a hefty stretch for the Mustang chassis and underbody components being evaluated by Ford. While the engines, gearboxes, differential, and rear-suspension geometry could be poached from the 2015 Mustang, a car with the proper dimensions (think 16 feet long, or more) would force significant reengineering and retooling of many of the sports car’s components.

If the new RWD sedan underpinnings are approved, of these three cars, the smart money has Ford going with the CTS/5-series competitor. Still, even with a green light, there still will be some significant drivetrain work to be done.

Complications: One Technical, the Other Managerial

Looking at the mid-luxury-sedan landscape, pretty much every product offers optional all-wheel drive (with the ironic exception of the Ford-planned and -developed Jaguar XF, although it will add the tech in the next couple of years). Packaging and engineering an AWD system for the Mustang-derived architecture will be a big upfront challenge to getting the model approved. History has shown that luxury sedans become virtually salesproof throughout the Northeast, Midwest, and in the Rockies from November through April if they don’t offer all-wheel drive. This makes development of AWD a gilt-edged priority.

Even if such a model is approved, rides on rear-drive bones, and offers all-wheel drive, perhaps the biggest roadblock to a Lincoln performance sedan is the blue oval itself. The Ford brand is a sponge when it comes to product, and, if such a vehicle is approved, the Ford executives will want a version, citing immediate volume realization and commensurate quick economic payoff. But despite those things, and regardless of how well a Ford version might take the fight to the upcoming Chevrolet SS sedan, it is essential that the product be Lincoln’s and Lincoln’s alone.

With initially low sales volumes and relatively high variable cost to produce the Lincoln performance luxury sedan, it likely will take two product generations to see meaningful returns. If Ford isn’t willing to wait the decade it’s going to take to revitalize Lincoln the right way, it should probably just fold its luxury brand now and save itself the inevitable “death of a thousand cuts” fate that awaits any carmaker that expects to redeem a brand in 60 months on the cheap.

Posted in Automotive Production | Tagged , | Leave a comment